Category ArchiveBooks reviewed
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 31 Jul 2015
An Essential Ready Reference: “Catastrophic Failure” & Stephen Coughlin’s ‘Red Pill Brief’ On The Islamist Threat
Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad
By Stephen Coughlin
Center for Security Policy Press, 2015
In this essential guide to the Islamist threat, attorney and decorated intelligence officer Stephen Coughlin puts his finger on the central transgression among our civilian and military intelligence community — as well as that of Federal policymakers responsible for protecting our country: Dereliction of Duty.
Far too many of those who take an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States, he points out, have broken faith with that vow and shrink from their duty to fulfill it.
Given the surging Jihadist threat — the point of the spear for our Islamist enemies — too many of our officials and advisers are putting our freedoms, our heritage, our culture, our safety, and our very lives in danger.
(Your reviewer’s task is a lighter one since twice attending Coughlin’s gripping hour-plus-long briefings.)
In his book, Coughlin has all the room he needs fully to go into some of the topics to which he could only refer briefly in person, such as–
- the inroads the postmodern outlook is making among the faculty of the military academies;
- the consequent denigration of the role of facts in analysis and writing;
- and a general “collapse of critical thinking” among top military leadership.
The first part of Catastrophic Failure is devoted to Coughlin’s Red Pill Brief which, as a recalled Army reserve officer posted to the Joint Chiefs of Staff Intelligence Directorate after the attacks of September 11, 2001, he began presenting in 2002.
“The reference is to the popular 1999 science fiction movie The Matrix, in which the hero is given the option of taking a red pill that will enable him to see the world as it really is. He is warned, however, that if he takes the pill, he can never return to the computer-generated reality to which he is accustomed, made necessary by the requirement to hide the malevolent nature of the world in which he actually lives.” (p. 66) (Highlighting Forum’s throughout.)
Coughlin began in the fall of 2001 by researching authoritative books of Islamic law, and “found they could be mapped, with repeatable precision, to the stated doctrines and information that groups like Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood disclosed about themselves when speaking to each other.”
His work followed the protocols of “traditional threat analysis,” the military intelligence approach into which Coughlin and generations of military personnel before him had been trained.
Classic threat analysis is based on what the enemy says about himself (such as Hitler’s Mein Kampf) and maps that to the enemy’s capabilities and opportunities.
Coughlin’s briefings “easily outperformed competing explanations” — accurately predicting how perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing and Fort Hood massacre would explain why they attacked.
The Red Pill Brief tamed the chaos of politically correct “complexity” by using evidence-based arguments, meticulously documented with original sources.
But the Pentagon fired Coughlin** during the Bush Administration in 2008. His Red Pill Brief-approach was banned by the Obama White House in 2012.
“In October 2011, elements of the American Muslim Brotherhood wrote the White House demanding an embargo or discontinuation of information and materials relating to Islamic-based terrorism — even insisting on firings, ‘re-trainings,’ and ‘purges’ of officers, analysts, special agents and decision makers who created or made such materials available.” (p. 21)
A few months later–
“…the FBI then proceeded to undertake the very purging of documents that the Brotherhood had demanded. The Department of Defense followed shortly thereafter with a Soviet-style purge of individuals along with disciplinary actions and re-education.
Not only did the Secretary of State endorse such curbs on speech, the Assistant Attorney general seemed eager to enforce them. As with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) — and through it, our Middle Eastern allies — also seek to embargo all unsanctioned discussions of Islam as a matter of international law.” (p. 22)
Words such as Shariah and Jihad were mandated into oblivion.
And, shockingly, that gag order continues to hold sway over our intelligence community today, with no clear end in sight.
The illustration on the cover of Coughlin’s book — an American eagle blindfolded with a green bandana over the crossed swords of Islam — is an apt metaphor for the official Federal clamp-down on the truth about Islamists.
“While they may seem abstract, these questions are raised because a principle objective we are facing in the War on Terror is the successful manipulation of the First Amendment.” (p. 490)
Coughlin believes there is an underlying philosophical reason why the forces of common sense in the U.S. intelligence community were not able to fight back, remove the blindfold, and prevail.
He points to the corrosive postmodern narrative which claims there is no objective truth, and insists on the need to “balance” arguments based on facts, like Coughlin’s, with the emotional perceptions of trendy subject-matter experts and vetted Islamic “moderates.”
Why are the insidious ideas of post-modern philosophy so dangerous to our country right now?
Coughlin draws on his reading and training —
“In war ignorance brings defeat, especially for those who are sworn to support and defend us. While ignorance is not a crime for the average person, it is for professionals concerning subject matter that is the object of their professions. Why shouldn’t this hold true for national security professionals? For them, one requirement is that they know the enemy by undertaking real threat identification of entities that constitute actual threats to the Constitution and people of the United States.” (p. 16)
Coughlin calls for the U.S. intelligence community to be guided by a “reality-based threat doctrine analysis.”
“The proposed way forward calls for holding all national security leaders and professionals accountable for what they could have known had reasonable due diligence been undertaken to know.” (p. 502)
He argues that ignorance of the exigent Islamist threat, a tragic failure of America leadership at the beginning of the 21st century, constitutes this very dereliction of duty.
Coughlin points out that it is in our power to heal this self-inflicted weakness.
The “Information Battlespace”
Most of the struggle on the home front battle in the War on Terrorism occurs in the “information battlespace.”
Since “language is the key terrain in information warfare,” the first step is “understanding the enemy and using accurate descriptors.”
This, he writes, “is essential to exposing and countering the enemy’s ‘civilization-jihad’ ‘by our hand.’” (p. 505)
Of course, to implement this step in our country would require a sea change of political will in both political parties and in the military.
We can all be grateful that Stephen Coughlin has created this comprehensive handbook explaining the enemy’s threat doctrine and its immediate implications for us.
It is a hefty volume, but don’t be put off by that.
Every page is as readable and compelling as the courtroom argument of an outstanding lawyer before the jury on the biggest case of his professional life.
It is a user-friendly guide that you can open to any chapter and start exploring, a do-it-yourself kit for self-education, and a survival gift that keeps on giving.
**In 2008, during the Bush Administration, Coughlin’s work in the Pentagon ended because of “opposition to his work for the military by pro-Muslim officials within the office of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England” according to the Washington Times “Inside the Ring Column”.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 19 Jul 2015
This fast-paced novel, set in last year’s Hamas-Israel Tunnel War, could sharpen the way that many Americans perceive Israel and the Islamist threat that nation faces.
And the story will enable Americans to more fully recognize our own vulnerability to that looming horror.
Author Dan Gordon is an American movie writer and novelist–a real pro.
He also holds dual U.S. and Israel citizenship, and is a reserve captain in the Israel Defense Force (IDF).
His satirical White House scenes skewer the Obama Regime’s decision making.
The main characters are members of an observation team sent by the White House into Israel, plus their middle-aged Israeli IDF sherpa.
But the story turns on details that could only have come from personal observation or first-hand accounts.
At some point, you just say, “you can’t make this stuff up.”
What stands out most is the convincing picture of the Israeli people enduring the tunnel war.
Gordon shows them living almost normal lives thanks to the protection of the Iron Dome anti-missile defense system, only having to duck for a short time into shelters located at public places and set along the highway.
A teenage girl doing everyday duty in the defense force of her Gaza-border kibbutz, watching monitors in real time, becomes the key link in the chain of civil defense, as she spots the terrorists breaking out from their tunnel in a wheat field.
Gordon’s “Day of the Dead” could also enable us to see Israel in the manner Americans saw the enduring, spirited people of London during the Blitz (click here) –the German air attacks of 1940–a year before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and brought us into the war.
Day of the Dead could become another Uncle Tom’s Cabin for our post-9/11 world, especially when the narrative becomes a “major motion picture” as promised on the back cover.
For anti-slavery idealists, Uncle Tom’s Cabin acted as a zoom lens that transformed American slavery from a concerning but rather distant, almost abstract evil into an array of sharply etched, convincing characters, real people, black and white, caught in a diabolical system that seemed to allow for no reform.
The classic touched thousands of hearts and changed official outlooks (click here).
“Uncle Tom” has been turned into a pejorative term. But the novel itself, published a decade before the Civil War, portrayed Tom as a long-suffering Christian, a man whose faith enables him to love and forgive those who oppress him. To idealistic abolitionists, the enslaved Tom became a recognizable, noble human being.
Day of the Dead might well become a similar prism for us, as we wait for other 9/11 shoes to drop.
Will it help us revive the post-attack resolve that seems to have petered out, even as we face a resurgent Islamic Jihad with its determined final solution of putting the whole world under savage Sharia law?
Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have been touched by the influence (overt and subliminal) of the anti-Israel narrative arising from today’s Leftist-Islamist alliance.(Click here to see David Horowitz’ Islamo-Fascism and the War Against the Jews)
This tendentious Leftist-Islamist slant has colored the way much of our media portray Israel today: a technologically advanced nation but fundamentally an oppressor of a victimized Palestinian people.
Lamentably today’s contemporary anti-Semitic narrative has penetrated our “mainstream” media, academia, and, sadly, made inroads into the national offices of our “mainline” churches.
Day of the Dead: Book Two will be set on the U.S. southern border: terrorists equipped with Kalishnikovs, suicide vests, and plastic handcuffs will use Mexican drug tunnels to enter San Diego to stage mass killings and kidnappings. See our closely related Weigh Warnings On ISIS Tunnels!
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 10 Jan 2015
Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam? by Sam Solomon & Elias Al Maqdisi, (Charlottesville, VA), 2009.
I have long taken Islam’s encroachments on our civilization seriously, but this book turned on flashing lights and rang alarm bells.
It is because Christian convert Sam Solomon and his co-author Elias Al Maqdisi focus on the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration itself.
Their compelling brief conveys the entire dynamic of the process—its origins, its success in spreading Islam for more than 1400 years, and how the Islamic intelligentsia manipulates us by using it today.
The media typically fixate on spectacular attacks.
In their willful blindness, too many Western leaders insist the major threat is violent terrorism and ignorantly defend Islam as a “religion of peace.”
But the flood of legal immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers from Muslim countries is the principal way that expansionist Islam is consolidating itself in the West today.
This book gives readers the tools to put in context the bewildering panoply of Muslim political activities—from the flow of Middle East money to construct huge new Islamic Centers, to the “interfaith” outreach of mosques in American communities today, to the blandishments paid to both cultural figures and politicians of all stripes who are awarded exchange trips to Turkey, to the Da’wa (the brutal call to submit or die) of the Islamic State as it expands through violent Jihad.
Solomon and Al Maqdisi call Muslim immigration to the West a modern-day Trojan horse, a reference to the giant, hollow wooden horse statue, set on the beach before the walls of the ancient city of Troy by the besieging Greek army.
As recounted by the epic poet Homer, the Greeks built the Trojan horse as a master stroke of deception, to trick the citizens of Troy into a fatal decision: to bring a belly full of enemy shock troops into the heart of their city.
Hijra and Jihad: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Both Hijra (migration) and jihad, Solomon and Al Maqdisi point out, are Muslim religious and political duties.
They are venerable strategies that share common objectives: high among them, “the Islamization of the West.”
“The Hijra was enshrined by Muhammad himself from the outset within Islam as the ‘Doctrine of Immigration,’ or the ‘peaceful’ means of extending the Islamic political state garbed and girded in religious terminology. Hijra and military conquest are two components of Islamic expansion.” [Highlighting Forum’s.]
Islamic scholars have detailed every aspect of the story, preserved in the Sunnah (story of the prophet’s life), of how Muhammad developed this doctrine successfully to relocate his followers from Mecca, where they were under surveillance, to the then-Jewish city of Yathrib.
Through tactics like collecting intelligence about the power structure of the city, playing one group against another, beguiling the city fathers with flattering “revelations” about the Jewish tradition (which he later conveniently denied), and by selective assassination, Muhammad took over the city and renamed it Medina, the city of the prophet.
There he built the first mosque not just as a place for believers to assemble and pray, but also “to organize himself and his followers to launch attacks on his enemies.” [Highlighting Forum’s.]
Migration to Medina forged Islam as we know it today.
As the authors point out:
“Muhammad’s Sunnah contains all the needed directives to consolidate the Muslim immigrant community and to establish it as a dynamic and forward socio-political force, even when the original intent of the immigrants is to seek other goals, including the stray cases of those who aim at being integrated into the host society.”
Migration facilitated the spread of Islam across North Africa, to India, to Malaysia, to Indonesia, and now to Europe and the Americas—till it reached its current numbers of an estimated 1.5 billion.
Hijra strategies (“considered of divine origin as they stem from the Qur’an and the Sunnah”), include self-segregation, establishing Mosques (scroll down here), consolidating the community, building coalitions with local interest groups (called Ta’leef al Qulub, “reconciliation of hearts”), divide-and-conquer deals through “payments in cash or in kind”), and takiyya or deception.
Solomon and Al Maqdisi shine a searchlight on strategies such as tay’seer (lightening the burden of new immigrants by temporarily loosening strict Shariah rules) and darura’ (allowing new migrants, as necessary, to conform with host country dietary, dress, and other customs).
With these time-tested tactics, employed at appropriate stages, Islamic political intellectuals can maintain this expansionist vision over lifetimes and not lose their purpose.
In sharp contrast to the historic American experience that foreigners come here for civic and economic betterment, and that the norm for our immigrants is patriotic assimilation–Mohammad forbid his followers to immigrate to a non-Muslim country simply for a better life.
“However, they were and are allowed both pleasure and personal gain should the ultimate aim of advancing the cause of Islam be in some way part of the reason for their migration…”
Hijra in America
Nearly fourteen centuries after Muhammed’s conquest of Medina, the “Project” of the Muslim Brotherhood, detailed in documents here captured in an FBI raid and used as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation Trials of 2007 and 2008, stands as powerful testimony to the Islamic immigration plan for America today.
This book does not make action recommendations, but a few leap to mind: institute a moratorium on legal immigration (including “refugee resettlement”) from groups who have no intention of assimilating into our culture; control our borders and track non-citizen visitors; deport known security risks; repeal the Obama Regime gag rule on intelligence-community training about and analysis of Jihad and Shariah; and, by public ridicule, make a laughing-stock of the red-herring “Islamophobia.”
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 24 Jun 2013
Agents of Red Influence, Fellow Travelers, and Today’s Dhimmis: How Accommodation to Stalin From the New Deal through WW II Blinds Us To Today’s Islamist Threat
By Susan Freis Falknor
American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character, Diana West, St. Martin’s Press (New York), 2013.
In this landmark analysis, Diana West surveys the great penetration of our national government by Communist agents of Soviet Russia, documented from early defectors, all the way through KGB archives published at the end of the Cold War.
Author West explores this unholy territory—not as some intellectual exercise–but to re-direct the public searchlight on today’s great totalitarian penetration by the agents of Islam and its all-encompassing code of Shariah.
Because the history of Communism is not routinely taught, she believes Americans are largely ignorant of its history of staggering bloodshed (at least 20 million killed under the Stalin regime), and its history of terror in Russia and abroad.
And because we are still in denial about our appeasement of World War II ally Joseph Stalin, Americans have “no context” to assess today’s totalitarian challenge: Islamist Supremacism and Shariah.
Our “deferential attitude toward the two ideologies is deeply and tragically related,” columnist West argues.
“It was a soul-selling deal our forefathers made with Communism as represented by the Soviet Union. We as their heirs, must come to terms with it. We will continue to pay until we do.”
West’s book argues that our government’s “failure to speak freely about Islam”—a policy that many of us have found so baffling in recent years—can be best understood as a case of the unacknowledged sins of the fathers being visited upon their blindsided children.
Her task is ambitious; her sweep of crucial but too-little-known facts of history is impressive; and her arguments are eloquent and witty.
Soviet Penetration of America
West does not talk much about those Americans in the 1940s and 1950s—the millions of American Christians, anti-Communist Jews, political conservatives, ordinary business owners, patriotic elected officials, and sidelined anti-Soviet U.S. diplomats—who did in fact recognize and speak out about Communism’s moral threat.
Understandably, she decries the narratives that won out, becoming dominant in our culture—the great successes of the Left to misrepresent, canonize, or smear various historical actors.
The Left, for example, has been largely victorious in painting three major mid-century political leaders—who did speak out on communism and its penetration—with derision (Barry Goldwater); dismissiveness (President Ronald Reagan); and bogey-man-like horror (Senator Joseph McCarthy).
She also tears the mask off the still-largely-successful project to shield the deeply flawed World War II leadership of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his dark reliance on his top aide Harry Hopkins, later shown to be a secret Soviet agent (Venona Secrets, Romerstein and Breindel).
She points to America’s “lavish and almost indiscriminate” Lend Lease aid to the Soviet Union, to which Roosevelt gave precedence over supplying American campaigns and British allies. Modern and vitally needed fighter airplanes, for example, intended for Singapore (which fell to the Japanese in February 1942) were diverted to Russia.
West, whose father fought in the D-Day landing, asks whether the decision to make the invasion landing in Normandy represented a very unwise concession to Stalin. The better alternative, she suggests, would have been Winston Churchill’s recommendation to continue into south central Europe from Italy and via the Adriatic and Aegean Seas. This would have constrained the Soviet march across eastern Europe.
West asks whether both the Normandy Invasion and the Stalin-backed policy of unconditional surrender (the Allies declining to work with disaffected but also anti-Communist German generals) might represent, at heart, two highly successful Soviet “influence operations.”
Unconditional surrender, she writes, lengthened the war for years, increasing the toll of death and destruction; made it possible for the Third Reich to complete the “final solution” of exterminating the Jews; and enabled the post-war Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe.
Fast forward four decades: In negotiations at the end of the Cold War in 1989, president George H.W. Bush ceded to Russia’s Mikhail Gorbachev what amounts to a self-imposed gag order—setting “a scrupulously nonjudgmental and even supplicating tone” in talking about our Cold War victory.
All these policy failures, West argues, amount to complicity with the murderous tyranny of the Soviet Union throughout its history and a cover up of the stunning successes of Soviet wartime penetration of America.
Because of this cover up, we have been largely dependent on invaluable gifts of intelligence information—such as documents from disaffected elements in the Russian secret police–and from our own intercepts many of which are finally available in the Venona Papers—for the inside story of wartime Soviet penetration.
And not facing up to the implications of our elite’s complicity in this lengthy cover-up increased our own vulnerability to a stealthy collectivism.
“You don’t have to win to win,” West dryly remarks.
Dhimmis and Fellow Travelers:
Totalitarianism Hijacks Morality Itself
Both Communism (with its disciplined operatives and true-believing fellow travelers) and Militant Islam (with its highly placed enablers of Civilization Jihad), seek to cloud our society’s moral judgment.
Civilization Jihad is the Muslim Brotherhood’s own term for its most ambitious influence operation.
For this campaign to make progress, West points out, Shariah apologists have to conceal the substantial, shocking evidence that Islam is not a religion of peace: Islam’s key role in the American slave trade; the ongoing practice of slavery today; forced conversion; death for apostasy; censorship; child rape; pillage and military conquest; and most recently, the advent of “no-go zones” ceded by police in European countries.
The War on Definitions
A key weapon of the totalitarian: instilling in our discussions the “conditioned reflex of rejection [of forbidden words], becoming instantly derisive and scoffing in disbelief”—in this case, to deny descriptive words such as “Bolshevik,” “Communism,” or “Socialism,” a place at the respectable table.
“What is being rejected,” West points out, “is definition itself, labeling, even with a factual basis.”
This “short-circuits” the thinking process, leaving us intellectually undefended.
Needed: A Personal Coming To Terms
The goal of Communism, Islam, and totalitarian systems in general, according to West, is to “suppress all individuality.”
This is done by stifling alternative points of view; attacking or denigrating those who think differently; and putting off limits certain inconvenient concepts, such as liberty, the right to defend oneself, freedom of association, freedom of speech, and even the most basic tools of logical, evidence-based argumentation.
This diabolical perspective, she notes, has made itself dominant in our colleges and universities, as well as in much of our public discussion.
The long march of cultural Marxism severely weakened America and the West, the author argues.
We now live in “not a West that simply fails to appreciate itself anymore but rather a West that isn’t itself anymore.”
The ultimate battleground in this struggle, however, is the individual mind, heart, and moral soul.
It is West’s comprehension of this individual battleground that makes this book so personal, so passionate, and so powerfully eye-opening.
In The Power and the Glory, Graham Greene described the role of a priest in confession as “to draw [the] mind slowly down the drab passages which led to horror, grief, and repentance.” Greene thus details a purgative psychological process, something like the now so-called “stages of grief.”
To lead us along a similar transformational path is the task to which Diana West sets herself.
And that is why American Betrayal is one of those books that will change the way many of us see the world.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 07 Sep 2011
After America: Get Ready for Armageddon, by Mark Steyn, Regnery Publishing, Inc: 2011. Available through Amazon.
In his new book After America, indispensable commentator Mark Steyn goes well beyond the point, demonstrated in his previous book, that America is headed in a dangerous, even suicidal direction. Now he warns that we may be losing the ability to correct course.
And in doing so, we may be losing our will to self-govern as well.
“Americans face a choice: you can rediscover the animating principles of the American idea—of limited government, a self-reliant citizenry, and the opportunities to exploit your talents to the fullest—or you can join most of the rest of the world in terminal decline.”
Steyn weaves in his broad knowledge of contemporary Britain, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and the Third World. He also up-ends our accustomed perspective by taking us on fantasy time-travel episodes.
To keep up readers’ spirits in this desert of grave perils, the author provides sustaining manna: Steyn’s signature wit.
“Americans face a choice: you can rediscover the animating principles of the American idea—of limited government, a self-reliant citizenry, and the opportunities to exploit your talents to the fullest—or you can join most of the rest of the world in terminal decline.”
Steyn paints an American present in which the Ruling Class, at least, is driving as hard as it can in the direction of Europe, which is already tipping into a dystopia of socialism, failing productivity, population aging, growing Islamist influence, diminished freedoms, increasingly undeliverable promised social benefits, and debt.
Steyn elucidates clearly just how big government — which brings more restrictive laws, more regulations, and more unpayable government benefits — crushes liberty and shrinks the space in which the once-free citizen operated.
Expansion of anti-liberty government is driven by bad ideas, measures adopted by elected officials who did not “read the bill,” and by “judge-made law and bureaucrat-made regulations.”
The last two practices effectively control citizens without consent of the governed.
Steyn’s book tracks many dangers.
- First, there is a huge public debt that threatens to rob prosperity from the American people and future generations. “Big Government augmented by a terrible education system and a tide of mass immigration” he declares, is “a life killer.”
- As to the civic culture, which is the “glue” of society, he cites the baleful influence of political correctness, infantilization of citizens, and multiculturalism.
How do you position yourself to fight all this?
The field of action runs a lot further than the cyclical drama of elective politics, according to Steyn.
Using Canada as an example, he writes:
“Once the state swells to a certain size, the people available to fill the ever expanding number of governments will be statists—sometimes hard-core Marxist statists, sometimes social-engineering multiculti statists, sometimes fluffily “compassionate” statists, sometimes patrician nobles oblige statists, but always statists. The short history of the post-war western democracies is that you don’t need a president-for-life if you’ve got a bureaucracy-for-life….”
Steyn urges us to recognize a tyrannous bureaucracy as something we should urge elected officials to actively resist.
After America… what happens to America?
In the all-too-possible future era Steyn portrays, the United States would find itself between a weakening advanced world and a “reprimitivizing” world. Domestically, Steyn speculates–
“A statist America won’t be a large Sweden—unimportant but prosperous—but something close to the Third World. As a dead-end economy drives its surplus manpower deeper into poverty, addiction, and crime, parts of the country will take on post-Soviet Russian characteristics, with a gangster class manipulating social disintegration for its own ends. What’s left will be Latin America, corrupt and chaotic, broke and brutish—for all but a privileged few.”
Steyn contemplates scenarios for American implosion, with say, a bankrupt California being nationalized, the Southwest deciding to break away, or perhaps, “still functioning states… may opt for de jure secession, anxious to escape being buried by federal debt.”
“You Can Win This”
Despite the somberness of his message, Steyn ends on a hopeful note.
He suggests some directions to fight: to decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, de-monopolize, de-complicate, de-credentialize, dis-entitle, and de-normalize.
“You can win this. Statists overreach. They did on ‘climate change’ scaremongering, and the result is that it’s over. Hollywood buffoons will continue to lecture from their mega-mansions that we should toss out our washers and beat our clothes dry on the rocks singing native chants down by the river, but only suckers are listening to them.….
“Liberty cannot survive if only a few are eternally vigilant. We need more. We took our eyes off the colleges, and the high schools, and the grade schools and these and many other institutions were coopted by forces deeply hostile to the American idea. So push back, beginning in kindergarten….
Steyn directly addresses American youth who, more than any other group, will have to deal with this situation:
“Sooner or later you guys have to crawl out from under the social engineering and rediscover the contrarian spirit for which youth was once known…. This will be the great battle of the next generation—to reclaim your birthright from those who spent it. If you don’t, the entire global order will teeter and fall. But, if you do, you will have won a great victory.”
This is not just a book well worth reading – – but one essential for every conservative who wants to get their society and their politicians to correct course while there is still time.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 02 Feb 2011
By Susan Freis Falknor
By Kenneth R. Timmerman
Cassiopeia Press, 2011
“There are no secrets in Iraq, my dear Colonel. There are only stories that don’t get told.”
With St. Peter’s Bones, novelist and journalist Kenneth Timmerman tells the sort of tale that rarely makes it to the radar screen of most American readers: a tale of anguish and heroism among Iraq’s beleaguered Christian minority.
This book is artful and rewarding. But it is more than that. For those of us in the Judaeo-Christian tradition, Timmerman’s novel illuminates sources of some serious threats to our own religious liberty.
Named a recipient of the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award, Timmerman sets his story in the tumultuous Iraq of right now — after the fall of Saddam Hussein, at a moment when the final withdrawal of U.S. troops is widely discussed, but not yet completed.
As a long-time investigator whose special beat is the Middle East, Timmerman has vast personal experience to draw on to capture the details of daily life in Iraq. And, as a novelist, Timmerman weaves in elements of fable, communicating an even deeper sense of the challenges, traditions, and identity of Iraqi Christians.
The setting of the novel spans the history of Syrian (“Nestorian”) Christians back to the time of the apostles. It springs from questions such as:
What if, in 595 AD, a Nestorian monk named Bahira had composed a secret manuscript recounting his encounters with — and his unsuccessful struggles to educate and make a Christian leader of — a gifted, illiterate, seizure-afflicted young camel-caravan driver named Ubul Kassim, none other than the future Prophet Mohammed?
And, what if, around the year 846, when the Saracens (that is, Muslims) laid siege to Rome, the Pope had ordered Hormizd IV Abouna to carry St. Peter’s remains to safety and to protect them through his descendants — the bones ending up in the monastery of Mar Hormizd, in present day Kurdistan?
And, bringing the story up to the present moment, what if a young Syrian Christian “terp” (interpreter) named Yohannes Yohanna, working for U.S. forces, stumbles across the ancient mystery and thereby becomes a target of the militant Baathist Abu Hassan, who would kill to prevent the release of documents illustrating Christian influence on the young Mohammed?
The long-shrouded mystery begins to unwind itself when lieutenant colonel Danny Wilkins, Yohannes’ special forces employer, hands him a few photo-copied pages of an ancient manuscript found in the house where Abu Hassan had taken refuge before his arrest by Wilkins.
Yohannes is able to read the document because it is written in old Aramaic, which is the liturgical language of his church. Yohannes’ mother tongue is Swayada, a form of modern Aramaic.
Yohannes (“Johnny” to his American comrades) is the 28-year old son of Hannah Yohanna (his father has been killed in a church firebombing). The other children are Rita (two years younger than Yohannes), a law graduate who works with the Assyrian Democratic Movement; Yousrah, still younger, a sometime student at the University of Mosul; and a volatile younger brother, Marco.
At the request of Father Shemoun who runs the Chaldean Patriarchy in Amman, Yohannes accompanies a “fact-finding” American mission trip to the Christian community of Iraq — a delegation that includes such characters as former southern governor Frank Aiken, Gary Utz of Christians United, and Philadelphia Catholic priest Francis Pacelli.
Among the party is Dona Hollinger, a California-born woman about Yohannes’ age whose mother is of Syrian Christian heritage.
Strong, smart, and beautiful, Dona supplies the romantic interest for the novel. The American missionaries soon delve into in the mystery of the Nestorian manuscript and the location of St. Peter’s bones.
The narrative takes us all over Iraq and Jordan, from Mosul, to the Christian neighborhood of Karmalesh near Mosul, to Ebril in the Nineveh Plain, to Amman in Jordan, to the monastery of St. Hormizd in the mountains near the Turkish border, above al Qosh.
Timmerman vividly portrays a dark, menacing world. There is division and treachery in the American camp. Yohannes and his family are harassed by terrifying phone calls and threats on the street.
In the course of the novel sister Rita is kidnapped. Brother Marco dies heroically resisting a suicide bomber at a church food-distribution center while the mother Hannah is critically injured in the blast.
Yohannes attends the funeral of the kidnapped then murdered Archbishop Paulos Faraj Rahho, in Amman. The young interpreter’s frightening taxi ride around Amman, which ends with him jumping out of the car after the taxi driver pulls a knife, is based on an incident from Timmerman’s own Middle East adventures.
At one point, Yohannes tries to get his family out of Iraq. But when he visits the UNHCR refugee commission in Amman, he finds that nothing he can say, nor his letters of commendation from his American commanders, make any impression on the woman interviewer.
“‘You are a Christian.’ She spat out the words, her lip visibly curling up in contempt.”
Yohannes’ reflections capture the anxiety and danger of life in a persecuted Christian community.
“‘When they want to make an omelet in the East, they use Christians as eggs,’ Nana Soraya used to say. Under Sadddam, we had controlled mayhem, organized murder. If you were lucky and kept quiet, you would be allowed to live; some even prospered, counting their blessings, holding their breath. Once Saddam was gone, we just had mayhem.”
“Every week, one or two Christians would get kidnapped or murdered, or a church would be set on fire mysteriously. The newspapers always painted such incidents as criminal attacks, but everyone knew what was really going on. The jihadis controlled the mosques, the schools, and much of the police. As Iraqi Christians we lived outside the law, outside of society, like ghosts hovering at the edges of a world to which we once belonged. And so we huddled in our basements and whispered to each other at church, afraid to go out, afraid to work, afraid to be seen together.”
“Every Christian brought up in this part of the world knows that our lives hang on the slenderest of threads. We like to call it the grace of God and surely that is the truth. But on a more mundane and practical level, we live because the Muslims allow us to live. We die when they grow weary of tolerance, or when we refuse to pay the tribute, the Jizya.”
The most basic issue Yohannes must come to terms with, however, is not the danger all around him, but rather what is he to make of his own Assyrian Christian tradition of turning the other cheek.
“Over the centuries, we Christians of the East have survived the collapse of empires. We have survived wars and pogroms, even attempted genocide. We were taught to rejoice that our suffering allowed us to participate in the sufferings of Christ,‘so that you may be overjoyed when his glory is revealed.’[I Peter 4:13] We were taught to submit to the earthly Prince, whoever he might be, because only Christ is King. And so we remained unorganized and unarmed as Sunnis and Shias and Kurds formed militias, relying on the new order imposed by the Americans and watching the chaos that ensured like helpless members of a Greek chorus as the tragedy reaches the crescendo of its utterly predictable conclusion. Only rarely in the history of our Assyrian nation have we defended ourselves. I am no longer sure.”
In the course of this story Yohannes fights at the side of the American occupation forces and at the side of the militant Order of St. Hormizd, helping to protect the monastery.
At the end, he turns down a chance to leave for the safety of the United States. Saying farewell to Dona, he explains:
“I can’t leave this…. Not now. There comes a time when you have to stand up for something. I must stay here. I must fight… Come back, Dona….[C]ome back and join me here. Come back and fight for your people. We can make the future together.”
It seems that in the crucible of today’s Iraq, Syrian Christian Yohannes Yohanna is transformed into a Christian soldier.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 02 Jun 2010
By Susan Freis Falknor
The Human Factor: Inside the CIA’s Dysfunctional Intelligence Culture by Ishmael Jones
Encounter Books (2008; new material added 2010)
“The Marine Corps issued orders for the benefit of the United States. CIA orders
were issued for the convenience of the bureaucracy.”
“Call me Ishmael,” begins the fictional narrator of Herman Melville’s Moby Dick. The invitation forms a memorable opening to this famous American novel of Captain Ahab’s obsessive quest to kill the formidable white whale.
And so, with some resonance, the narrator of The Human Factor presents himself with the nom de plume (indeed, the nom de guerre) of Ishmael Jones.
Son of American parents in an unspecified branch of foreign service, Ishmael grew up on posts in the Middle East, East Asia, and East Africa, giving him an ease with languages and the startlingly clear perspective that an American growing up overseas can sometimes bring to assessments of domestic ways.
He attended a U.S. college and graduate school, served as an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps, and went to work in a Wall Street investment firm.
Then he joined the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the late 1980s “with one purpose in mind: to serve my country.”
“My service, except for initial training, was in continuous field assignments overseas, in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Western Europe while working on WMD targets, and in Iraq while working on terrorist targets during the war.”
The Human Factor is a vivid, witty, engaging, and sometimes surreal personal memoir of the author’s training in tradecraft with his CIA entering class; getting stationed overseas; and recruiting rogue-state weapons scientists while posing as a commercial software manufacturer.
Ishmael recounts holding interviews with “men with bad breath” in seedy European hotel rooms. He recalls how he had to maneuver around CIA paycheck delays that could sometimes last for “a year or two.”
A constant theme is the need to outwit and outmaneuver his own “risk-averse” supervisors to carry out his professional duties. At one point he comments:
“The people of India under the License Raj and the people of Eastern Europe under Communism reminded me of my colleagues in the CIA. Subject to a maze of restrictive bureaucratic rules and procedures, human creativity and productivity are blocked.”
(The License Raj was the elaborate system of licensing and regulations that India imposed on business activities from just after the end of World War II until 1990.)
Through it all, Ishmael interweaves reassuring asides about how he made a secure life and happy home for his wife and children, even during several tough postings overseas.
Ishmael’s CIA career stretched through the 1990s and most of the first decade of this century. This period saw the arrests of traitorous CIA agents Aldrich Ames (1994) and Harold Nicholson (1996). Ames in 1985 had betrayed agents working for the U.S. against the Soviet Union.
It included the 1995 “Paris Flap,” in which French security, “possibly for its own internal purposes during an election season,” put the Paris CIA station under surveillance, and then released much of the information to the media, causing several France-stationed CIA officers to be recalled home. Ishmael explains its larger significance:
“The Paris Flap had immense repercussions not only for operations in France but also for the Agency has a whole. It was a seminal event in risk aversion. The Paris Flap taught Agency managers that a complaint from a foreign government to an American ambassador about the espionage activities of the station could result in closure of all intelligence operations in that country and could end the careers of all case officers involved.”
During his career as an overseas agent, Ishmael witnessed the ranks of his talented entering class dwindle, seeing them ordered home to desk jobs, or leaving the CIA altogether.
In a sense, his lonely position in those last few years echoes the ending of Moby Dick, after narrator Ishmael has become the only survivor from Ahab’s wrecked ship:
“And I only am escaped alone to tell thee.”
Ishmael’s CIA tenure included September 11, 2001, and its disappointing aftermath.
“I knew I was watching an intelligence failure unfurl, and within seconds of watching that airplane hit the World Trade Center, I thought: This will bring reform and accountability to the CIA . . . . I thought: America will see that it needs a functioning intelligence agency, not a failed bureaucracy.”
After a few months of unprecedented freedom to act in the field, during which time Agency officers were, for example, “successful” working with the military in Afghanistan, even coming close to capturing Osama Bin Laden at Tora Bora–the CIA “bureaucracy roared back stronger than ever.”
“By March of 2002, the bureaucracy was certain that no heads would roll. It figured that its methods–avoidance of risk, creation of management layers–had been vindicated.”
In the wake of 9/11, Congress gave the CIA “virtually unlimited billions of dollars.” The most visible result was that a rash of “Potemkin offices” opened up around the United States to house a flood of new recruits, while the CIA overseas presence continued to languish.
Ishmael’s tenure covered most of the Bush presidency, the Valerie Plame-Joseph Wilson scandal, and Porter Goss’ 2004-2006 stint as CIA director. “I was excited about Goss’ arrival,” Ishmael writes, but hoped-for agency reforms did not materialize. His final assignment included some months supporting combat operations in Iraq, wearing a Kevlar vest and working with the Army to destroy terrorists.
At the end of his Iraq assignment, Ishmael resigned from the Agency:
“I resigned when I decided further service was pointless and that my best contribution to our nation’s defense would be to enter the debate on the on the reform of the CIA.”
From the Belly of the Beast
Ishmael gives us his own take on the machinery of the CIA. Here are some of his insights which we found, frankly, jaw-dropping. Our first reaction? Where are the Congressional overseers?
Retired Employees: “The really big money went not to the ordinary retired case officers, though, but to the retired Agency mandarins who formed contracting companies. The requirement that everyone involved in Agency contracting have a security clearance kept anyone out of the game except former Agency employees.”
. . . . .
“Some of the contracting companies were ‘body shops’ that supplied retirees to the Agency. The company would get a contract from the Agency to supply a number of retirees, at $250,000 per retiree, for example, and the contracting company would take $50,000 and [disburse] $200,000 to the retiree. Conventional wisdom within the CIA was that the payoff to the former mandarins running these companies would come not from gross revenue but from the sale of the company to a larger beltway contractor.”
Iraq: “Iraq was a unique environment, and both Agency and military intelligence officers were doing a fine job. In the rest of the world, I thought the military officers were much more capable and less risk-averse. The military can place 30 trained case officers in non-State Department positions nearly anywhere in the world within a matter of days. The Agency, with billions of dollars at its disposal, couldn’t do this in a decade.”
Syria: “The U.S.has no formal restrictions on espionage activity in Syria, but the Agency’s turf bureaucrats do, so Syria is a de facto safe haven from the Agency’s scrutiny. Agency operations from Iraq into Syria were blocked not by strategic or diplomatic considerations, but for the entirely inexcusable reason that Agency turf bureaucrats in Syria chose not to approve those operations.”
In a brief appendix to The Human Factor, Ishmael Jones lays out clear, straightforward solutions for “reform of the clandestine service.”
He characterizes the CIA as a “failed organization that has proved resistant to reform.” Therefore, the CIA “should be broken up into its constituent parts, and those parts assigned to organizations that already have clear missions and defined chains of command . . . .”
Most of all, the author warns, “We should recognize the scope of the problem,” which, as he points out, stretches back a half-century.
The “scope” includes major intelligence failures with military consequences that gravely damaged at least 10 American presidencies, according to Jones.
Ishmael Jone’s book is a fascinating if disheartening look at the living anatomy of the best known organization in our intelligence community. Don’t miss it.
REVIEWER’S ADD-ON: The book reviewed here is the paperback edition of The Human Factor, with new material added in 2010. Faithful readers will recall that we have previously visited Ishmael Jones here, here, and here.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 28 Jan 2010
Reviewed by Susan Freis Falknor
George Gilder, The Israel Test (Richard Vigilante Books) 2009.
George Gilder contends in The Israel Test that the key advantage of the capitalist and technology-fostering West against impoverishing socialism, radical Islam, and barbarism is a much-unappreciated conflux of human and cultural capital known as the Jewish people.
Economic and social commentator Gilder sees the attitude towards Israel as a litmus test that sorts out countries and individuals along what he perceives as the greatest divide of our time:
“The prime issue is not a global war of civilizations between the West and Islam or a split between Arabs and Jews. These conflicts are real and salient, but they obscure the deeper moral and ideological war. The real issue is between the rule of law and the rule of leveler egalitarianism, between creative excellence and covetous ‘fairness,’ between admiration of achievement versus envy and resentment of it.”
In elucidating this profound split, Gilder ascribes a new significance to anti-Semitism today.
“In countries where Jews are free to invent and create, they pile up conspicuous wealth and arouse envy and suspicion. In this age of information when the achievements of mind have widely outpaced the power of masses and material force, Jews have forged much of the science and wealth of the era. Their pioneering contributions to quantum theory enabled the digital age. Their breakthroughs in nuclear science and computer science propelled the West to victory in World War II and the cold war. Their bioengineering inventions have enhanced the health and their microchip designs are fueling the growth of nations everywhere. Their genius has leavened the culture and economy of the world.”
As to the importance of Jews to the United States, Gilder writes:
“Virtually all Americans who have achieved anything important in the twentieth century have had crucial Jewish colleagues and collaborators. Virtually none of the significant technological feats of the twentieth century would have been possible without critical contributions by Jews.”
Marxists impugn capitalism as a zero-sum game in which one small group prospers only through the expropriation of the wealth of the many. To the contrary, Gilder argues, capitalism is a “positive-sum game,” that is “based on an upward spiral of gains, with no essential limits to the creation of wealth.” It is, in fact, he writes, the only system that can build wealth broadly while making democracy work. By contrast, the “crippling error of zero-sum economics” is the “chief cause of poverty”
Gilder documents the economic damage that anti-Semitism exacted from the many twentieth-century European countries which fell victim to it.
Several chapters probe the futility of what he ironically refers to as a “land for war” bargain with Palestinian voices – – as well as the great human tragedy of the profoundly anti-Semitic Palestinian economy and political culture.
Gilder also tells the story of the recent emergence of Israel as a world financial center, spurred by a series of tax cuts beginning in the 1980s.
Gilder recounts the work of John von Neumann and others Jews whose discoveries in theoretical mathematics and physics underlie the signature applied sciences of today – – from the atomic bomb to modern computing and optics.
Many of his chapters are in themselves contributions to the recent history of science. Interviewing many of technology’s contemporary heroes, he highlights the pioneering computer work of holocaust survivor Dov Frohman, of physicist and Biblical scholar David Medved, and of Saifun Semiconductors‘ Boaz Eitan, to name just three. He traces the careers of these original thinkers in the U.S. and Israel, showing how they brought Israel “Inside the Internet.”
Gilder tells the story of the emergence of Israel as a technological innovator, which has made the “tiny country” today a “global center of microchip, telecom, optics, software, biotech, and medical-devices research, the country’s development and entrepreneurship rivaled only by its partners in Silicon Valley.”
Here is Gilder’s succinct review –“Silicon Israel: How market capitalism saved the Jewish state” – – of the Israeli IT industry. “Many of Intel’s key products could be stamped Israel Inside,” Gilder explains. But market and technology commentator Gilder also reminds us in this article of the transformation of a country which “[upheld] a philosophy of victimization and socialist redistribution that could only impede its progress” to “accomplish[ing] the most overwhelming transformation in the history of economics . . . .”
In closing, the 70-year-old Gilder recounts his own personal “Israel Test,” which he underwent as a young man attending the Phillips Exeter Academy, a national New Hampshire-based school founded in 1781. Descendant of an old, intellectual New England family, Gilder abruptly found himself crowded out of a coveted spot on the Exonian editorial board by a group of classmates that he sneeringly identified to himself as “New York Jews.”
Gilder recalls how sorely he was tempted to give in to the same passions of envy and anger that have always driven anti-Semitism. But an “intelligent and beautiful” tutor from Radcliffe College, by confessing herself also to be a “New York Jew,” brought the young Gilder to a better mind:
“To this day I recall the moment as a supreme mortification and as a turning point. Rather than recognizing my shortcomings and inferiority and resolving to overcome them in the future, I had blamed the people who had outperformed me.”
The Israel Test is a challenging book which is both an eloquent polemic and a collection of well-crafted essays. Yet, the wide-ranging chapters are not so much digressions from his main theme as enriching perspectives on it.
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 06 Nov 2009
UPDATE: SCROLL DOWN TO SEE THE AG’S CAIR STUMBLE!
Reviewed by Susan Freis Falknor.
Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America, P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry (Los Angeles: WND Books), 2009.
“There’s only three degrees of separation between international terrorism and what happens in Fairfax County,” observes a senior Fairfax County [Virginia] Police Department detective. “Our society here is totally infiltrated by the bad guys.” – -Paul Sperry interview January 16, 2009 in Muslim Mafia.
This history of recent radical Islamist activity by David Gaubatz, former agent, Air Force Office of Special Investigations, and Paul Sperry, author of Infiltration (2005), focuses on the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the leading national Muslim organization.
The chapter headings alone arrest one’s attention. Here is a sample: “Muslims Victimizing Muslims,” “CAIR’s Arab Paymasters,” “Blackmailing Corporate America,” “Faking out the Infidel,” “NAIT [North American Islamic Trust] and the Economic Jihad.”
In their prefatory “Note of Caution,” however, the authors underscore that – –
“This is not a book about Islam or Muslims in general. It is about the threat of Shariah Islam and violent jihad propaganda by a criminal class of Muslims known as the Muslim Brotherhood or the ‘Ikhwan mafia.’ This secretive organization dominates most established Muslims groups and mosques in America while exploiting, manipulating, and even victimizing law-abiding Muslim Americans.Only a small share of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are part of this dangerous group.This book is about them.”
Is CAIR the NAACP for Muslims?
“To set the scene, here’s a brief ‘CAIR for Dummies’ backgrounder from author Paul Sperry, whose just-published best-seller Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America unmasks CAIR and its foreign backers:
“The Council on American-Islamic Relations bills itself as a ‘civil-rights advocacy group,’ much like the NAACP, but for Muslims.
However, the FBI says that far from being a benign nonprofit, CAIR is a front group for Hamas terrorists and the radical Muslim Brotherhood in America. And the bureau recently cut off formal ties to CAIR’s national office in Washington and all 30 of its branch offices across the country.
At the same time, the Justice Department has blacklisted CAIR as an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator in the largest terror finance case in U.S. history, the Holy Land Foundation trial. It ended in convictions on all 108 counts.
Prosecutors have also connected CAIR to the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that seeks to institutionalize Shariah law (think: Taliban) in America and the West through immigration, coercion and political infiltration.”
CAIR Documents Come to Light
The Muslim Mafia includes many documents accessed by Gaubatz’s son Christopher. The younger Gaubatz posed as David Marshall, a supposed Muslim convert, who served as an intern at CAIR’s headquarters and in its Sterling, Virginia office.
CAIR and the authors of the Muslim Mafia are currently in court over the documents. This week Politico’s Josh Gerstein “Judge muzzles author over CAIR files” here reports on the latest round in the litigation.
Although this book references Islamist activities in Los Angeles, Chicago, and other places around the country, much of the narrative takes place in the Washington area—on Capitol Hill; CAIR’s national offices on New Jersey Avenue; Beltway mosques and the large Muslim community in Northern Virginia; and the headquarters of the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal security agencies.
This setting is only logical given the subject matter, but it also lends the book a special appeal to those familiar with Northern Virginia.
For example, the authors look at now-Representative Gerry Connolly’s current role in Congress, as well as his role as then-chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors in the controversy over renewing the Islamic Saudi Academy lease. For our own coverage of that lamentable affair, readers are invited to go here and here.
‘Throwing Sand in the Eyes’ of Law Enforcement
CAIR’s star rose quickly in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks—with the organization playing the role of advocate for a loyal American minority community and as an expert bridge-builder between the Muslim culture and the U.S. government.
The gambit worked for years, according to the authors.
Within a few days of the attacks, CAIR officials were chosen to appear with President George W. Bush at the Islamic Center of Washington. What the authors call the “PC-addled” FBI, hoping to forge positive relations with an important part of the Muslim establishment, reached out energetically to CAIR. Bureau representatives attended CAIR banquets, and set up visits between CAIR and Bureau officials at FBI headquarters in Washington. CAIR also enjoyed much success in finding jobs for its agents in key Congressional offices, according to Muslim Mafia.
CAIR played a prominent role in providing extensive “cultural awareness education” to law- enforcement agencies both national and local, say Gaubatz and Sperry. They characterize CAIR’s diversity training as “a dangerous disinformation program” which “lectures them to be sensitive to Muslims and respectful of Islamic customs while misleading them about the meaning of jihad.”
CAIR’s security training presented Jihad as a moral struggle within the individual, rather than as a deadly holy war to dominate unbelievers, Gaubatz and Sperry write.
Gaubatz and Sperry revealed that the training warned officers, in dealing with Muslims, to guard against racial profiling and any appearance of “police misconduct.” The training stipulated avoiding frisking, touching, or even standing too close to Muslim suspects. CAIR’s trainers also warned police not to use dogs to search Muslim homes, remove their shoes before entering a Muslim home or mosque, and not touch the Quran during searches.
If police ran across a case of domestic violence, they were directed not to take the usual protective steps on behalf of the woman, but to refer the couple to their local Muslim clerics for counseling, according to the authors.
In the course of one training session in Chicago, Gaubatz and Sperry relate, the Department of Homeland Security took CAIR on a VIP tour of security operations at the nation’s busiest airport, at the same time British authorities were working to break up a major plot to blow up U.S. bound airplanes
And CAIR’s bridge to Muslims in America has not turned out to be a two-way street, according to the authors. In its ‘Muslim community safety kit distributed at mosques,’ for example, CAIR advised Muslims to ‘know your rights’ not to talk to FBI agents–undercutting agents’ attempts to get to know the Islamic community, the authors explain.
From 2003 to 2006, the respected Higgins Center for Counter Terrorism Research trained the Fairfax County Policy Department, the largest in Northern Virginia, in counter-terrorism methods. CAIR “complained” that one of the Higgins courses “portrayed Islam in a bad light,” the authors report, which led to the loss of Higgins’ contract.
One of the officers who objected to the Higgins Center, according to a 2009 interview by Paul Sperry with a high-ranking Fairfax police official, was Muslim police sergeant Mohammad Weiss Rasool, Muslim Mafia relates.
Rasool “in 2008 pleaded guilty to illegally accessing a classified federal database to tip off a Muslim friend under surveillance as part of a terrorism investigation,” say Gaubatz and Sperry.
The authors also explain that Mohammad Weiss Rasool is no longer with the Fairfax police force.
Moreover, in 2007, in a search of a terrorist suspect’s home in the Washington suburbs, FBI agents found secret documents “naming CAIR and other ‘mainstream’ groups as “part of a Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy to support terrorism and to infiltrate and destroy the American system from within.”
The seized documents were entered as evidence in the largest-ever terrorist-financing case, write Gaubatz and Sperry. The Justice Department named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator. CAIR was also named by a Texas court as among those entities that “are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee and/or its organizations.”
Four House Anti-terrorism Caucus Members Ask for Action and Answers
Last October 14, 2009, Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C, founder of the House Anti-terrorism Caucus, who had also written a foreword for Muslim Mafia, issued a press release with three other members of the Caucus: Representatives John Shadegg, R-Ariz., Trent Franks, R-Ariz., and Paul Broun, R-Ga.
As their press release detailed – –
“In response to these recent claims in Muslim Mafia, Myrick, Shadegg, Broun, and Franks call on:
1) The US Department of Justice to share with each member of Congress and their Chiefs of Staff an executive summary of the findings that led them to name CAIR as a co-conspirator in a terrorism case;
2) The House Sergeant at Arms to work with the Staff Directors and Committee Chairmen of the House Judiciary, Homeland Security and Intelligence Committees to see if CAIR was successful in placing interns in any of said committees since the drafting of this memo in January of 2007;
3) The Internal Revenue Service to launch a full investigation into the legality of the lobbying activities of CAIR to judge if they are in violation of their federal non-profit status.
‘It’s frightening to think that an organization with clear-cut ties to terrorism could have a hand in influencing policy – especially national security policy – within our government,’ said Rep. Myrick. ‘The investigations that we’re asking for are simple, and I’m hopeful that they will bring to light any and all information regarding the goals of CAIR.’”
Muslim Mafia will doubtless be a blow to CAIR, but more importantly the book sheds much needed light on what appears to be a significant effort to “Islamize America.”
Readers will want to play close attention to the material presented in order to make their own assessment of this threat to our historic freedoms.
. . . . . . . . . .
“Attorney General Eric Holder has agreed to give a keynote speech next week to a Michigan group which includes the local branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations even though the FBI has formally severed contacts with the controversial Muslim civil rights organization.”
. . . . .
“Former terrorism prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, a CAIR critic, said he was disappointed but not taken aback by the FBI’s parsing of its ban on ‘formal contacts’ with the Muslim group. ‘I wish I could say I’m surprised but I’m not remotely surprised,’ McCarthy said. ‘When [the FBI] said they cut off formal ties with them, whenever they say something like that you have to look very carefully at the way it’s worded… The last administration was guilty of it, this administration is guilty of it—they have determined it is more important to have what it can publicly hold out as ties to the Muslim community than it is to be careful about who you have the ties with.‘” (Underscoring Forum’s.)
Debbie Schlussel has declared for some months that the FBI has been meeting with CAIR in Michigan and elsewhere
Books reviewed Susan Freis Falknor on 16 Jun 2009
Reviewed by Susan Freis Falknor.
Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them, by Steve Milloy, Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2009.
It was July 7, 2007, and the Live Earth concert was underway in Meadowland in New Jersey, one of seven “Concerts for a Climate in Crisis” to be held that day in the U.S., China, UK, Brazil, Antarctica, South Africa, Japan, and Australia. But some aspects of the Meadowland event didn’t quite fit into the green template. An aerial advertising plane kept flying over Giant Stadium trailing a banner which read, “DON’T BELIEVE AL GORE.” Then, right as Gore was addressing the crowd, the pilot, getting into the spirit of the occasion, repeatedly dove down to buzz the stadium.
There were also some surprises for concert planners in the parking lot. A group of students from the libertarian group BureauCrash handed out dozens of blue-and-green earth-globe beach balls printed with the motto: “I’m more worried about the intellectual climate.” Millions of TV viewers saw the beach balls bouncing around in the crowd, even landing up on stage.
“After the show, Live Earth performer John Mayer spent most of his press conference angrily complaining about our antics,” writes Steve Milloy—Fox News commentator, publisher of the website Junk Science and author of this book.
“Nevertheless we made our point in front of the Live Earth crowd.”
This creative protest at the 2007 Live Earth concert is one example of how people can fight back against what has become an environmentalist steamroller, writes Milloy in Green Hell.
What is the “Green Hell” to which the title of this book refers?
That’s the place we are condemned to go when the suggestions of environmentalists—affecting everything from the color of your light bulbs to the temperature of your showers, from mandated cars to permissible sources of energy—become mandates.
It is the point when the greens “stop hectoring” and “begin dictating . . . environmental virtue,” when “voluntary participation gives way to compulsory green living,“ when we find ourselves “under the green thumb.”
“There is almost no personal behavior of yours that they consider too trivial or too sacrosanct to regulate,” Milloy emphasizes. For example, a critique of our “personal carbon footprint” on the Nature Conservancy website targets “the choices we make in our homes, our travel, the food we eat, and what we buy and throw away. . . .”
Nor is anything too big to escape the reach of the green police.
- Green lawsuits attack energy development and other kinds of industries.
- Greens burden the military by including them under the restrictions of laws like the “ironically named” Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
- Greens raise the specter of global warming to regulate trade and undermine national sovereignty.
- Greens threaten the scientific method itself with carrots (funding for scientists) and sticks (such as personal smears of opponents and even the threat of “an appearance in front of some future ‘Climate Nuremburg’ court.”)
- Greens heavily influence education, tirelessly working to replace “academic inquisitiveness” with “politicized dogma.”
And, once they gain a foothold in the legal system, green-living mandates are not put in place as temporary hardship measures to cope with a particular crisis, like gasoline rationing during World War II.
Instead, what green orthodoxy demands is “a permanent restructuring of life as you know it.”
Milloy details the far-flung ambitions of the green agenda, explores the dubious provenance of its “scientific” rationales. He follows the exaggerated mandates that derive from them, and tracks the funding sources of the environmental movement.
He discusses green tactics, which he summarizes as “intimidation, demonization, and government diktats.”
He discusses prominent personalities among the “green elite,” and describes the tough situation we now face since the election of Barrack Obama,
In Green Hell, Milloy has produced a combat manual as well as a field guide. Even acknowledging that “the greens have us out-funded and out-organized on every front,” there are plenty of ways to fight back, he insists.
First, Milloy urges readers to unmask the green buzzwords, bringing to light the unappealing policies beneath.
For example, “sustainability” really means “being against all economic activity and development.” The term “green” is but “a soothing symbol disguising an oppressive lifestyle full of unnecessary burdens and hardships.”
The very universality of the green challenge, however, suggests the potential broadness of a resistance coalition.
Yet, we have no “organized political opposition to green public policies,” says Milloy—no inclusive coalition. We don’t even have a term in our vocabulary for this kind of resistance.
Nevertheless, people with determination and imagination can accomplish a lot where they are.
Milloy includes step-by-step instructions on how to launch a shareholder campaign, a forum which the greens have used to great advantage, but which can also be used to oppose them. Employees and retirees can raise questions about green issues affecting their pension plans.
In combating “mindless green-ness” in the workplace or community, Milloy suggests going to a public meeting and, having prepared yourself with the facts, “make a nuisance of yourself.”
“Ask questions. How much will it cost? What are the supposed benefits? Is there really a problem to start with or is one being manufactured for some reason? And demand answers. You’ll be surprised at how off-guard you’ll catch the greens, how they can’t defend their demands, and how they’ll try to ignore you or shout you down. Get on the Internet and share your experience with the world . . . ”
Milloy lists key books and videos that critique the excesses of the environmental movement.
He tells stories of spirited resistance. Tales to stiffen the spine of anti-green activists. War stories like Milloy’s own disruption at the 2007 Live Earth concert with its airborne banner: “DON’T BELIEVE AL GORE.”